|
|
|
|
Methyl Chloride Production from Methane over Lanthanum-Based Catalysts.Simon G. Podkolzin 1, Eric E. Stangland 1, Mark E. Jones 1, Elvira Peringer 2, and Johannes A. Lercher 2Journal of the American Chemical Society 129(9), 2569-2576, 2007Publisher: American Chemical Society, CODEN: JACSAT ISSN: 0002-7863 | |||||||||||||||||
|
CH4 CH3Cl CH2Cl2 CHCl3 In a non-catalytic (radical) gas-phase reaction, reactivity increases with the partial charge on carbon: M1δ+ < M2δ+ < M3δ+ As a result, selectivity to methyl chloride in methane chlorination falls precipitously with increasing methane conversion. |
For traditional catalysts, the selectivity trend in methane activation is the same as for the radical gas-phase chemistry, because surface chlorine has a negative charge. It is progressively easier for negatively charged chlorine to react with with positively charged carbon of chloromethanes. |
|
Traditional chlorination catalysts work through a reduction-oxidation cycle of a transition metal supported on an metal oxide support. Such systems usually have 3 components:
A stabilizer is required due to volatility of transition metal chlorides. And even with a stabilizer, traditional catalysts are unstable at the temperatures needed for methane activation. In addition, such catalysts promote the conversion of HCl to Cl2 (Deacon reaction); and then Cl2 reacts with methane in the gas-phase, bringing the overall reaction selectivity closer to that observed in gas-phase non-catalytic chemistry. Our work shows that catalysts based only on lanthanum, are stable and selective for methane hydroclorination: CH4 + HCl + 0.5 O2 → CHCl3 + H2O Lanthanum is not a reducible metal - it does not change its oxidation state - at usual reaction conditions. Due to its irreducibility, lanthanum has been previously thought to be an inert catalyst component used as a stabilized for volatile transition metal chlorides . The mechanism of methane activation over lanthanum catalysts, therefore, should be significantly different from the redox cycle for transition metals, such as copper, shown above. |
|
|
Reaction pulses with the full feed and with a mixture of CH4 and O2 (without HCl) monitored by a mass spectrometer. |
Comparison of calculated and experimental LaOCl Raman spectra. Evolution of in-situ Raman spectra with the extent of catalyst chlorination. |
Results of reaction pulses and
in-situ Raman spectra suggest that:
|
|
|
|
|
| Reaction kinetic measurements as a function of oxygen partial pressure without methane in the feed show that elemental chlorine is produced at higher oxygen partial pressures. The rate of chlorine evolution, however, is significantly lower than the rate of methyl chloride production when methane is present in the feed, and in addition, these two rates are not correlated. Therefore, it can be concluded that at the usual reaction conditions methane activation is mainly a surface reaction, which is not influenced by the formation of gas-phase chlorine radicals or reactions with gas-phase chlorine. | |
|
Proposed reaction mechanism for oxidative chlorination of methane based on DFT calculations. Numbers next to element symbols show partial atom charges calculated with the Hirshfeld method. |
|
Possible reaction mechanism based
on catalyst characterization and kinetic measurements was evaluated with
DFT calculations. Calculations suggest that:
The proposed new mechanism for methane activation, thus, involves a chlorine redox cycle - changing of the formal oxidation state of surface chlorine from -1 to +1 without any changes in the oxidation state of the underlying metal. |
|
Reaction mechanism studies suggest that it is preferable to operate methane oxidative chlorination at high methane feed reactions in order to maintain high selectivity to methyl chloride and potentially achieve complete HCl conversion. Advantages of such operating conditions are described in the patent application WO 2006 118935 by Simon Podkolzin et al. "Oxidative halogenation of C1 hydrocarbons to halogenated C1 hydrocarbons".
![]()
![]()