|
|
|
|
Catalytic Hydrogen-Chlorine Exchange between Chlorinated Hydrocarbons under Oxygen-Free Conditions.Alwies W. A. M. van der Heijden1, Simon G. Podkolzin 2, Mark E. Jones 2, Johannes H. Bitter1, Bert M. Weckhuysen1Angewandte Chemie International Edition 47(27), 5002-5004, 2008Publisher: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim; CODEN: ACIEF5, ISSN: 1433-7851 | ||||||||||||||||
![]() |
Lanthanum trichloride LaCl3 was
found to be an active, selective and stable catalyst for chlorine-hydrogen
exchange reactions in the absence of any gas-phase or surface lattice
oxygen. CH2Cl2 + CCl4 → 2 CHCl3 Bulk LaCl3 structures obtained through different preparation methods are active with noticeable activity above 400°C, as shown in the Figure. Supported LaCl3, particularly samples supported on carbon nanofibers, exhibit significant catalytic activity already above 300°C at the tested space velocities and partial pressures of the feed components: GHSV = 400 h-1 and inlet concentrations CCl4 = CH2Cl2 = 4.7 vol . Possible steps in the reaction mechanism were evaluated with DFT calculations. The calculations suggest that neither CCl4 nor CH2Cl2 is likely to adsorb molecularly on a fully chlorinated ideal surface of LaCl3. However, it is energetically favorable for chloromethanes to split off a Cl atom and donate it to the surface.
|
|
Activity of LaCl3 as a function of temperature. Data collected by Alwies van der Heijden at the Utrecht University. |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Reaction 2: CH2Cl2 (g) + Cl–LaCl2 (s) → CHCl3 (g) + H–LaCl2 (s)
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Reaction 3: CCl4 (g) + H–LaCl2 (s) → CHCl3 (g) + Cl–LaCl2 (s) |
|
Calculated energies for Reaction 2 where H is exchanged for a surface lattice Cl are high at 310-324 kJ/mol, regardless of the presence or position of any neighboring defects (Cl vacancy or F-center Cl vacancy). This result suggests that gas-phase chlorinated hydrocarbons, such as CH2Cl2, are unlikely to exchange their H for a Cl anion from the LaCl3 lattice. However, the calculations also suggest that the surface of LaCl3 can have not only terminal lattice Cl, but also weakly held adsorbed Cl species (Figure 1a). These species are calculated to have a significantly smaller Hirshfeld atomic partial charge of -0.09 compared to -0.22 for surface lattice Cl anions, and they can be viewed as a build-up of an additional Cl layer for the bulk structure, so that the coordination of surface La atoms increases from 8 to 9, the same as for the bulk La atoms.
When gas-phase CH2Cl2 exchanges one of its H atoms for an adsorbed surface Cl atom, the products are gas-phase CHCl3 and a surface hydride (Figure 1b). Similarly to the adsorbed surface Cl, surface H is weakly bound, and it has only a small atomic charge of -0.05. The calculated energy change for Reaction 2 is 210 kJ/mol at the adsorbed Cl coverage of 0.25 monolayer (ML). Gas-phase CCl4 (Figure 2a) can react with the surface hydride, regenerating the adsorbed Cl species and forming gas-phase CHCl3, as shown in Figure 2b. This Reaction 3 is predicted to be exothermic at -225 kJ/mol.
When the calculations for Reactions 2 and 3 were repeated at a higher
adsorbed Cl coverage of 0.5 ML, their energetic favorability reversed. Instead
of being endothermic, Reaction 2 became energetically favorable at -170
kJ/mol; and Reaction 3 became endothermic at 155 kJ/mol. This dependence of
the reaction energetics on adsorbed chlorine coverage implies that as the
concentration of adsorbed Cl builds up during the reaction, a substitution of
these Cl species by H becomes more favorable, and, conversely, the reverse
exchange becomes less favorable. The surface, therefore, is likely to maintain
some equilibrium concentration of adsorbed Cl and H species: when the
concentration of surface Cl exceeds the equilibrium value, the reaction of Cl
to H exchange as in Figure 1a-b will be favored, and, conversely, when the
concentration of surface H is relatively high, the reverse H for Cl exchange
as in Figure 2a-b will be preferentially taking place.
![]()
![]()